
There are parts of the insurance industry that sit comfortably within boardrooms, spreadsheets and well-defined distribution models. And then there are parts that don’t.
My recent conversation with Oscar Shabalala, Business Development Head and Stakeholder Relations at CTU Underwriting Managers, is a reminder that much of South Africa’s real economy operates at the edge of those models. The commuter transport sector, taxis and buses, is one of them. It is messy. It is under pressure. And yet, it is absolutely essential.
A sector under strain - Let’s start with the reality. Two years ago, South Africa was selling around 1,400 new taxis a month. Today, that number has halved. That is not a cyclical dip. It is structural pressure.
Tighter lending criteria. Reduced passenger volumes. Rising fuel costs. Overtraded routes. Vehicles not being replaced. Operators stretching already thin margins just to stay on the road. And when businesses are under pressure, something predictable happens. Insurance becomes optional.
Not because it is not needed, but because it is no longer affordable. Oscar puts it plainly: “Operators are increasingly taking the risk to self-insure". Let that sink in. In a sector where a single loss can wipe out a business, operators are choosing to carry that risk themselves.
The uncomfortable gap - The numbers tell an even more uncomfortable story. There are roughly 300,000 taxis operating in South Africa. Only about 80,000 are insured. That is not just a gap. That is a systemic failure. And before we rush to blame affordability, and it is a real issue, we need to be honest about something else. Understanding
“Insurance is an enabler,” Shabalala says. It allows business continuity. It keeps operators in business after a loss. Yet, in large parts of this market, that message is not landing. Which raises a difficult question for the industry: are we failing to communicate value, or failing to design for reality?
Designing for survival - There is a tendency in insurance to believe that better products will solve penetration challenges. They won’t. Not in markets like this. Because the issue is not just what you sell, it is how it fits into the economic reality of the client.
When fuel accounts for around 40% of operating costs, and revenue is under pressure, there is very little room left for anything else. This is where the conversation shifts from product to partnership. Shabalala speaks about “wallet-friendly solutions” and continuous engagement. Translated, that means the industry must get closer. Closer to operators. Closer to associations. Closer to the lived reality of the sector.
Because if insurance is not built into the operating model of the business, it will always be the first thing to fall away.
Risk management as relevance - There is, however, a more encouraging thread in the conversation, one that the broader industry should pay attention to. Data. Not the kind that sits in reports, but the kind that changes behaviour. CTU is actively using claims data to identify patterns, hijacking hotspots, accident-prone areas, driver-related risks, and feeding that back into the market through brokers.
This is where insurance starts to shift from payer to partner. When insights lead to fewer accidents, safer routes, better driver behaviour, that is real value. Not at claim stage, but before the claim ever happens. And in a country grappling with road safety challenges, that value extends far beyond the insured. It becomes social.
The overlooked role of the broker - In all of this, one role stands out more clearly than ever. The broker. In a highly intermediated model like this, brokers are not just distributors. They are translators, educators, and increasingly, co-creators of solutions.
They sit closest to the client. They understand the pressures. They see where products don’t fit. They know when affordability becomes a breaking point, and importantly, they are starting to influence product design, feeding insights back to insurers to shape more relevant offerings. If we are serious about improving penetration in sectors like commuter transport, the answer will not come from product teams in isolation. It will come from ecosystems, and brokers are at the centre of them.
A broader reflection - There is a temptation to view sectors like taxi and bus insurance as niche. As specialist. As separate from the “mainstream” of insurance. That would be a mistake - Because what is happening here is simply a more extreme version of a broader trend. Affordability pressures. Underinsurance. Clients questioning value. Businesses making hard trade-offs.
The difference is that in the commuter transport sector, these pressures are more visible, and the consequences more immediate. When a taxi operator loses a vehicle without insurance, it is not just a claim event. It is a business shutting down. Jobs lost. Families impacted. A small but critical part of the economy disrupted.
Where to from here? - If there is one takeaway from this conversation, it is this: Insurance cannot afford to remain distant from the realities of the markets it serves. Not in product design. Not in pricing. Not in communication. Because where that distance exists, the market will respond in the only way it can. It will opt out.
The opportunity, however, is just as clear. Close the gap, through better education, more relevant solutions, and deeper collaboration, and the upside is significant. Not just in premiums written, but in businesses sustained, risks managed, and value delivered where it is needed most.
At the edge of the industry, where affordability meets reality, insurance has a choice. Be optional. Or be essential.
Profida is highly customisable to cater for specialist life, medical, and short-term insurance products (Yes, all 3). If you are an underwriting manager or broker looking for an Insurance Management Software Suite and want insight into your policy & claims administration, including underwriting, then Profida has what you need.

