Technology
08 minutes

Insurance built better

Based on a COVER interview with Cardinal Group CEO Graham Harvey, this article explores how insurance technology is shifting from isolated systems to connected ecosystems. Beyond AI hype, the real transformation lies in integration, eliminating double capture, and freeing brokers and insurers to focus on advice, risk and relationships.
Written by
Published on
February 13, 2026

When you speak to technology leaders who live inside the machinery of insurance every day, you quickly realise something: the real transformation isn’t happening in keynote slogans.  

It is happening in the unglamorous spaces, the handoffs between broker and insurer, the duplication of data, the delays in onboarding, and the clunky workflows that keep skilled people trapped in admin.

That was the dominant thread in my conversation with Graham Harvey, Founder and CEO of the Cardinal Group. We started with a simple question: how did 2025 land from an insurance technology perspective, and what does that mean for 2026? Graham’s answer was direct: Digital transformation is real, it is continuing, and while AI is the headline, the bigger story is the move from standalone systems to interconnected ecosystems.

From “system of record” to ecosystem of action - Graham described an industry that is steadily shifting away from single, monolithic platforms that act as static repositories,  the old “system of record” model, and towards ecosystems where data flows across partners in real time. In his view, the future is not one perfect system. It is a tightly integrated network of “best-of-breed” technologies that share data, automate tasks, and remove friction across the value chain.

He used the broker-insurer relationship to make the point. In the past, a broker might run a standalone PAS, generate reports for the insurer, and the insurer would process those reports internally. Those reports were “one-dimensional and static”. Today, insurers want to consume broker data directly into their own systems and then send information back into broker workflows, seamlessly, and without the delays and distortions that come with manual reporting.

This is not just a technology preference. It is a leadership and operating-model shift. It demands that insurers, brokers and service providers stop thinking like isolated businesses and start thinking like connected nodes in the same customer journey.

The real enemy: Double capture  - If one phrase captured Graham’s frustration, and his optimism, it was thisThere is no excuse for double capture”.

He pointed out how much of the industry still relies on email updates, phone calls, spreadsheets and recapturing information across multiple systems. It is not only inefficient; it is a direct contributor to cost, error, and poor service. And it keeps brokers and their teams locked in administration when they should be doing higher-value work: advising, interpreting risk, and servicing clients.

From Cardinal’s perspective, the opportunity for 2026 is straightforward: Build integrations that eliminate duplicate data entry and allow claims, servicing, onboarding and policy changes to move through the ecosystem without human “bridging work”.  

Graham referenced Cardinal’s own operational environments, including claims and supply chain processes, where the goal is to replace fragmented reporting with integrated workflows that update automatically and push information to the right parties at the right time.

AI is here, but it isn’t the point - Graham welcomed the industry’s experimentation with AI, calling it a buzzword that is not going away. But he was equally clear about what it is not,  “AI is not going to replace the financial adviser. Its value lies in assistance, improving efficiency, decision support, and speed”.

What makes his view powerful is that it anchors AI inside real processes. The next thrust, he argued, will be to use AI to enhance the interconnected ecosystem, by improving coding capability, accelerating digitisation, and raising the quality of automated workflows.

The practical promise is big. Graham believes AI and domain expertise combined can deliver material efficiency gains in onboarding and servicing, not through gimmicks, but by making engagement “more intelligent and slicker”, reducing admin and prompting better advice.

One example he gave is AI that reads proposal information, compares it to policy wording, and prompts the broker: ‘Are you aware of this?’,’ have you considered that?’. This is where AI becomes genuinely valuable, not as a replacement brain, but as a contextual assistant that helps brokers avoid mistakes, spot gaps, and serve clients faster.

“AI is not going to replace the financial adviser. Its value lies in assistance, improving efficiency, decision support, and speed.”

COVER

Competitive pressure is reshaping underwriting - Technology, in Graham’s view, is also being pulled forward by an increasingly aggressive competitive landscape among insurers. He noted that insurers performed strongly in 2025 from an underwriting perspective, but that competition and risk volatility are pushing them to understand risk far more deeply.

The old model was simple: Insure a building at a value and hope basic precautions are in place. The new model is data-rich: insurers want accurate risk information, better valuations, improved surveys, and stronger risk mitigation measures, both to price competitively and to manage exposure in a changing climate and macro environment.

This is where technology ecosystems and data integration become strategic, not optional. If insurers can onboard and quote faster, and understand risk better, they win. If they can’t, they will increasingly struggle to compete.

What gets in the way: Integration, context and legacy  - When I asked Graham what stops insurers and brokers from joining this ecosystem seamlessly, he pointed to a familiar culprit, legacy and complexity, especially in South Africa’s unique binder environment.

Broker businesses often sit with large, monolithic systems that were not designed for the realities of binder relationships and off-platform operations. The challenge is to make sure decisions made on-platform can be adhered to off-platform, including claims, pricing, and renewals. And insurers, meanwhile, want to maintain control of pricing logic and product rules even as distribution and servicing occurs across partner systems.

In other words, the technical work is hard, and it is expensive, but the cost of not doing it shows up everywhere else, in duplication, delays and operational risk.

The leadership mindset that makes it work –  One of the most valuable parts of our conversation was Graham’s description of the clients who adopt innovation more successfully.

He described “development partners”, businesses with less red tape and more entrepreneurial leadership, who want to operate at the tip of the spear. With these partners, Cardinal uses a sprint-based approach: test quickly, fail fast, ring-fence teams and trusted clients, and refine based on feedback. The objective is not to build massive, slow projects that only get tested a year later. It is to learn early and build what is actually needed.

He contrasted this with leaders who are “tech nouveau,” excited by demos and buzzwords, but not grounded in commercial reality, security requirements, data sensitivity, or the hidden cost of maintenance.

His warning was fair, “AI can look magical in a demo. In the real world, you must worry about sensitive information, POPIA risk, security, governance, and the ongoing maintenance burden of what you build”.

Don’t own the spear, stay at the tip of It  - Graham’s advice to brokers and insurers was pragmatic. If you are an insurance business rather than a technology business, your goal is to stay at the leading edge of innovation, but not necessarily to build everything yourself.

Internal builds can be expensive, risky, and fragile if knowledge is concentrated. The smarter approach is to work with best-of-breed partners, bring your insurance IP, and co-create, understanding that fast followers will copy most innovations quickly anyway. As he put it, “IP often has a short shelf life. The strategic advantage comes from being early, learning faster, and improving execution”.

The 2026 picture: A single pane of glass  - Graham ended with a vision that sits neatly inside the theme of “insurance built better”. The aim is to take the pain out of insurance administration for every party, insurer, broker, underwriter, service provider, claims handler, through an integrated technology ecosystem.

His phrase for it was ‘a single pane of glass’; one view where you can see what is happening across accounting systems, claims platforms, policy administration, service providers, and communications, and where every party can interact digitally without rekeying data or chasing updates.

For leaders planning 2026, the message is clear. AI matters. But the bigger win is integration. The industry’s next step is not more technology, it is technology that works together, removes duplication, and frees people to do the work only humans can do: Advise, judge, build relationships, and manage risk.

Help your clients protect what you love, for who you love.

With a Will and the Liberty Legacy Protection Plan.

The Liberty Legacy Protection Plan is underwritten by Guardrisk Life Ltd, a licensed life insurer and administered by Capital Legacy Solutions (Pty) Ltd (“Capital Legacy”), an authorised Financial Services Provider (FSP 43826). This product is equivalent to the Legacy Protection Plan® currently offered by Capital Legacy. The Liberty Legacy Protection Plan is sold by Quill Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd, an authorised Financial Services Provider (FSP 48117). Terms and conditions, Risks and limitation apply.

Dashboard mockup