
The biggest shift in recent years has been a quiet one. Not a technology platform. Not a product redesign. Just a deepening recognition of what motor insurance really is, and what it has to deliver to remain viable. Spend enough time in this space and you quickly realise: it is one of the hardest classes in which to consistently make money. Margins are thin, claims are frequent, and external factors from road conditions to vehicle crime are largely outside anyone's control.
In his conversation with COVER magazine, Grant Cross, founder and director of Motor Acceptances, brought this into sharp focus. After 26 years in the business, he carries no illusions about the challenges. But he also carries a quiet confidence about what still works, and what ultimately determines long-term success.
At the heart of it all is a deceptively simple truth: in motor insurance, the claims experience is the product. Not just a touchpoint, not just a KPI, but the entire value proposition.
The operating environment for motor fleets in South Africa is, by most accounts, becoming increasingly difficult. Road conditions continue to deteriorate across many areas, directly impacting accident frequency and severity. Add the ongoing challenges of theft and hijacking, and you have a class of business under sustained, compounding pressure.
The industry response has been predictable but necessary: increased underwriting discipline, more stringent requirements, and in some cases, tougher conditions for cover. One telling example is the growing insistence on multiple tracking devices in high-risk vehicles. A single visible tracker is no longer sufficient. Criminals have adapted. They know where to look and how to disable it. The introduction of secondary, often hidden or wireless tracking solutions is a direct response to this evolving threat landscape.
This is not just risk mitigation, it is survival. Without these interventions, loss ratios become unsustainable and portfolio economics quickly unravel.
It is easy to assume that technology is the answer. And to a large extent, it is part of the solution. From telematics to automated claims processing, the industry has invested heavily in digital tools designed to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
Yet, as Grant Cross points out, technology on its own is not enough. Every insurer today offers roadside assistance. Many have apps that allow clients to log claims, request assistance, and track progress in real time. These are valuable tools, particularly for younger, digitally inclined clients.
But what happens when a client actually has a claim? In that moment, often stressful, unfamiliar and urgent, many clients do not want an app. They want a person. Someone to guide them through the process, to explain what happens next, to provide reassurance. This is where the real gap often lies, and where Motor Acceptances has deliberately drawn its line.
Motor Acceptances' approach is deliberately simple: every client has a dedicated claims handler. A real person, known to the client, who manages the process from start to finish. Technology supports that process, but it does not replace the relationship. It is a reminder that digital transformation should enhance the experience, not eliminate the human connection at its core.
Another important dimension of fleet insurance is how product structures can be used to influence behaviour. The widespread use of burning-cost or deposit-premium models is a compelling example. Instead of paying the full premium upfront, clients pay a portion, with the balance dependent on claims performance. If claims remain within agreed thresholds, the client avoids the additional premium.
This creates a shared incentive. Fleet managers are encouraged to actively manage driver behaviour, enforce safety protocols, and reduce claims frequency. The better the performance, the lower the ultimate cost. It is a subtle but powerful mechanism. Insurance, in this context, becomes not just a transfer of risk, but a tool for actively managing it.
In motor fleet insurance, the broker sits at the centre of a complex, multi-directional relationship. Responsible for advising, structuring, and maintaining accounts, the broker must balance efficiency with strategic counsel. Allowing clients to report claims directly can accelerate the process and reduce friction, but the broker remains indispensable, particularly when issues escalate or renewal approaches.
The most effective models recognise both realities, streamlining administration while preserving the broker's advisory role. But this comes with a challenge. Consistency. As Grant Cross notes, exceptional service can be delivered 99% of the time, but a single failure can redefine the client's entire perception. In a claims-driven environment, there is very little margin for error.
After more than two decades in motor insurance, what stands out is not radical reinvention but consistent focus on fundamentals. Understanding the market. Engaging with brokers. Learning from competitors. Maintaining a hands-on, relational approach to business. There is also an underappreciated advantage in operating at scale without losing proximity to the client. Staying small enough to be responsive, large enough to be credible.
The motor insurance market will continue to evolve. Risks will shift. Technology will advance. But the businesses that endure will be those that never mistake innovation for the thing it should serve: a claims experience that actually delivers on the promise of insurance.
Profida is highly customisable to cater for specialist life, medical, and short-term insurance products (Yes, all 3). If you are an underwriting manager or broker looking for an Insurance Management Software Suite and want insight into your policy & claims administration, including underwriting, then Profida has what you need.

