
Political stability impact – 2025 elections and broker intermediation
In this 2nd-part of a 3 part series, OLEA Group’s, Ayouba SEYDOU, Director, of Placement and Reinsurance, talks to Kathy Malherbe, Freelance writer, about how the 2025 electoral landscape across Africa presents both opportunities and challenges for insurance markets.
Key markets, including several major economies, held elections in 2025 and continue to do so, potentially affecting regulatory policy continuity and market stability. Electoral periods typically witness increased infrastructure spending, political risk awareness and demand for specialised insurance products.
Insurance market volatility during campaign periods reflects broader economic uncertainty, with premium adjustments, capacity restrictions and enhanced due diligence requirements becoming commonplace. However, these periods also create opportunities for insurers with electoral risk expertise and brokers capable of navigating political transition complexities.
Brokers as market stabilisers during political transitions - Insurance brokers play crucial roles as market stabilisers during political transitions, serving as regulatory interpreters and compliance partners for international insurers unfamiliar with local political dynamics. Their risk assessment services during electoral uncertainty provide essential market intelligence, enabling informed decision-making regarding capacity deployment and risk retention strategies.
Cross-border placement expertise becomes particularly valuable during political transitions, as brokers navigate regulatory changes, maintain client relationships and ensure business continuity. Professional networks facilitating knowledge sharing among brokers across African markets create information flows essential for managing transition risks effectively.
Rise of state reinsurers and market dynamics - The emergence of government-backed reinsurance companies represents a significant market development across Africa. Ghana Re implemented a 20% local retention mandate, requiring direct insurers to place minimum percentages of their reinsurance requirements domestically. Kenya Re focuses particularly on agricultural insurance, supporting government food security objectives while building local reinsurance capacity.
More recently in the Francophone region we have seen the creation and operation for Faso Re. Whereas, Mali Re, Cameroun Re, and Benin Re are being discussed. Should we expect that the CIMA Region will soon see a state reinsurer in each country? Will there be a common legislation behind these? Many questions need to be answered.
Nigeria's state reinsurance initiatives reflect broader continental trends toward premium retention and capacity building through government-supported entities. These developments create complex competitive dynamics between state and private reinsurers, with political motivations often competing with commercial viability considerations.
Broker placement strategies require significant adaptation to accommodate state reinsurer relationships. Market concentration concerns arise as government-backed entities gain market share, potentially limiting competitive pricing and innovation. Brokers must balance client interests with regulatory expectations regarding local reinsurer support, while maintaining professional standards and fiduciary responsibilities.
Local legislation compliance risks and non-admitted placements - Regulatory enforcement of local legislation compliance has intensified across African markets, with substantial penalties for unauthorised insurance placements. Nigeria implemented $2 million penalties for unauthorised insurance placements, while Kenya has increased licensing violation sanctions significantly. These enforcement actions reflect regulatory maturity and determination to protect local markets while ensuring proper supervision.
Non-admitted placement enforcement actions have become increasingly sophisticated, with regulators developing capabilities to identify cross-border transactions circumventing local licensing requirements. Cross-border placement compliance complexities require enhanced due diligence, legal review and regulatory coordination across multiple jurisdictions.
Broker liability and professional indemnity implications have expanded substantially, with regulatory authorities holding brokers accountable for compliance failures in placement activities. Due diligence requirements for local legislation adherence now include: Comprehensive legal reviews, regulatory correspondence and ongoing monitoring throughout policy periods.
Read part 1 “Navigating elections, broker dynamics and regulatory compliance” here
Part 3 titled “Best practices for pan-African operations” will follow in our April Edition of COVER.

