Short term
04 minutes

Rethinking Risk: From Climate Reality to Cognitive Diversity

The definition of risk in insurance is expanding beyond physical threats to include human factors like cognitive diversity. Insights from the IIWC Edu Webinar highlight how climate change and neurodiversity are reshaping resilience, requiring insurers to rethink both external risk modelling and internal decision-making capabilities.
Written by
Published on
March 24, 2026

The IIWC Edu Webinar Collab held earlier this month, sponsored by HDI and Fulcrum and presented by Neurodiversify, offered more than just technical insights, it provided a timely reflection on how the insurance industry must evolve its understanding of risk itself. Across two distinct sessions, the conversation moved from the physical realities of climate change to the often-overlooked dynamics of human cognition in the workplace. Together, they painted a compelling picture: resilience is no longer just about assets and infrastructure, it’s also about people.

Wiebke Cundill, Team Lead for Natural Hazards and Climate Risk Analysis at HDI, set the tone with a clear message: climate risk is no longer a future concern. It is already reshaping the environments in which businesses operate. What was once framed as long-term modelling for 2050 or beyond is now visible in real-time, through increased flooding, prolonged heatwaves, and more erratic weather patterns across the globe.

In the South African context, this duality is particularly striking. While overall conditions may trend towards being hotter and drier, the intensity of rainfall events is increasing, creating a paradox where reduced annual rainfall does not equate to reduced flood risk. This shift challenges traditional assumptions about exposure and highlights the growing importance of understanding how risk manifests locally, not just globally.  

Cundill’s approach moved beyond awareness to action. She emphasised that resilience starts with understanding, knowing where your risks lie, how vulnerable your operations are, and what the financial implications could be if those risks materialise. Importantly, she reframed the role of regulation. While compliance requirements are increasing, they should not be the primary driver. The real incentive lies in safeguarding business continuity, protecting assets, and ensuring long-term viability in an increasingly volatile environment.

If the first session challenged how we think about external risk, the discussion on neurodiversity by Glynnis Clark-Miller a Neurodiversity Advocate at Neurodiversify,  shifted the focus inward. Her presentation highlighted a critical but often underexplored dimension of risk: the way people process information.

In an industry built on analysis, judgement, and decision-making, this is not a marginal issue. It is foundational. Clark-Miller pointed out that as much as one in five individuals may be neurodivergent, bringing different cognitive processing styles into the workplace. Yet, most organisational systems, processes, and expectations are designed around a predominantly linear way of thinking.

“Resilience in modern insurance is no longer just about managing external threats, it depends equally on how we think, interpret and respond to complexity.”

COVER

This creates an invisible tension. Individuals who process information in more complex, multidimensional ways may be misunderstood, perceived as slow, overly detailed, or even resistant, when in reality they are often engaging at a deeper analytical level. In a risk environment, this can be a significant advantage. The ability to recognise patterns, connect disparate information, and think systemically is exactly what is required to navigate increasingly complex risk landscapes.

Clark-Miller’s perspective reframed neurodiversity not as a diversity initiative, but as a strategic capability. When organisations create environments that accommodate different cognitive styles, they unlock stronger problem-solving, more robust decision-making, and ultimately, better outcomes. Conversely, when these differences are not recognised, the result is increased cognitive load, reduced clarity, and missed opportunities for innovation.

What made this webinar particularly powerful was the intersection of these two themes. Climate risk and neurodiversity may appear unrelated, but they are connected by a deeper shift in the industry: the need to embrace complexity.

Climate change is forcing insurers to rethink how risk is modelled, priced, and mitigated. At the same time, evolving workforce dynamics are challenging how organisations operate internally. Both require moving beyond traditional frameworks and adopting more adaptive, nuanced approaches.

For insurers, this presents a clear opportunity. On one hand, there is the chance to lead in climate resilience, developing products, insights, and advisory capabilities that help clients navigate physical risks. On the other, there is an opportunity to strengthen internal resilience by recognising and leveraging the full spectrum of human capability within their teams.

The takeaway is not simply that risk is changing, it is that our definition of risk must expand. It is no longer enough to focus solely on external threats. The ability to understand, interpret, and respond to those threats is equally critical.

In that sense, resilience becomes holistic. It is built not only through better data and infrastructure, but through better thinking, diverse, inclusive, and capable of handling the complexity that defines the modern risk landscape.

The Fulcrum Group of companies is the foremost independent provider of financial services to the South African insurance industry.

We offer innovative, effective premium collections and premium finance services to insurers, brokerages and UMA’s, allowing them to focus on what they do best: providing their customers with advice and service.

Fulcrum Collect (Pty) Ltd is an Authorised Financial Services Provider. FSP 50705

Dashboard mockup