
COVER recently hosted a webinar that brought together a diverse panel of industry voices to interrogate one big question: does the independent broker have a future, and if so, what does “future-fit” really look like?
Kicking off the session, Tony van Niekerk welcomed the panel around the table:
He then framed the discussion against three years of COVER’s broker research. The data shows a clear shift in sentiment: more than 60% of brokers now expect growth above premium inflation. Despite regulatory pressure, skills shortages and economic strain, brokers are more optimistic than they’ve been in years. That optimism, however, is tied to some hard realities, consolidation, specialisation, technology adoption and a deeper focus on risk management.
Fewer, bigger, better brokers - Elliot Schwartz unpacked the structural changes underway. Drawing on his early career in global retail, he likened “generalist” brokers to the old department stores that tried to be everything to everyone, and were ultimately disintermediated by specialists, discounters and online platforms.
In intermediated distribution, he argued, we’re seeing the same pattern:
The future therefore points to fewer, larger, and fundamentally “better” brokers, those that choose a clear strategic path instead of trying to be all things to all people. Specialisation can be by product (e.g. HCV), by platform (high-volume, always-on digital operations), or by customer segment (as PPS does with degreed professionals, maximising lifetime value rather than individual transaction margin).
Jannie and Philippie both echoed this. Broker numbers will shrink, but growth prospects remain strong for firms that differentiate through specialisation, technology and collaboration, not by trying to do everything themselves.
Independence, collaboration and scale
A central tension ran through the conversation: how do brokers stay truly independent while gaining the scale needed to compete?
Duncan Cairns stressed that independence remains core to client advocacy, but independence cannot mean isolation. Regulatory complexity, AI, business intelligence (BI) and cost pressures are simply too much for a small broker to manage alone. The answer, he argued, lies in new forms of working together:
Sandra Snowball highlighted that this collaborative instinct is already present within the FIA community, where fierce competitors are willing to share what works when the FIA hat is on. She also reinforced that consolidation could build trust and capability, provided brokers choose partners whose values and culture align.
SMMEs, risk management and the broker’s real edge
The panel agreed almost unanimously that SMMEs represent one of the biggest growth opportunities for intermediaries. In a South African economy where small and medium businesses are central to job creation and GDP, the need for proper advice and risk management is only increasing.
For Philippie, the real differentiator of the independent broker is, and will remain, quality advice and a deeper role in risk management, not just product placement. Insurance is only one part of risk management. Brokers that can understand their clients’ businesses, interpret data, and help them mitigate risk holistically will stand out.
Duncan framed this as a necessary evolution: brokers must become true risk managers and strategic partners to their clients, not price negotiators. With AI and BI, brokers can now compare policy wordings in seconds, analyse claims, and document advice more robustly, all of which supports better risk decisions and liability protection.
Sandra added a challenge to insurers: if they want future-fit intermediaries, they must help brokers build risk management capability through training, data and insight.
Technology, AI and doing what you couldn’t do before
Technology is not new to the industry, but the panel agreed that adoption is lagging. The problem is not the lack of tools, it is implementation, cost, skills and clarity of purpose.
Sandra noted that many brokers don’t yet have the basics in place: a professional website, secure systems, or a clear digital presence. Data security is also a growing barrier, in future, an insurer may not even be able to contract with a broker whose systems aren’t up to scratch.
Elliot cautioned against chasing every “shiny object”. The question is not how to do the same things faster and cheaper, but how to do things that weren’t possible before, such as highly personalised, usage-based, unbundled cover delivered exactly when and how the client needs it.
Practical guidance emerged for smaller brokers wanting to tap into AI and advanced tools without huge budgets:
Brand, communication and the client experience - Towards the end, the conversation turned to brand and client engagement. Tony reminded attendees that brand is not just a logo or colour palette, it’s the total experience clients have when dealing with you, across channels and over time.
Philippie emphasised consistency: one recognisable name, look and feel across all platforms. George Martin added that clients now expect the same quality of experience across every touchpoint, digital, call, branch, claims. Omnichannel consistency is as much a brand issue as a service one.
Duncan argued that the real work of branding starts internally. Brokers must first understand who they are and what they stand for, then live that brand in every interaction. Only once the internal reality matches the brand promise does it make sense to invest heavily in external marketing.
Elliot distilled brand strategy into a simple test: can you complete this sentence? “Only my brokerage can satisfy [this specific client’s] need for [this specific thing] in a way that’s plausibly different from everyone else.” If not, work on that first. Once defined, every strategic and technological decision, including consolidation and new channels, must be judged against that promise.
In closing, Tony thanked Renasa for their sponsorship of the webinar and reminded attendees that COVER will deepen its broker research in 2026 through more qualitative, conversation-based engagement. The aim is to keep taking the pulse of the independent broker market and to surface the insights and interventions needed to ensure that independent advice not only survives, but thrives, in the decade ahead.

